tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post8504419301694825106..comments2024-03-18T03:36:29.926+05:30Comments on Controversies in History: Kumarikandam (Lemuria) Tamil MythModa Sattvahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16790418181426022089noreply@blogger.comBlogger20125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-44186595954128165212017-02-12T08:54:28.059+05:302017-02-12T08:54:28.059+05:30The BBC link mention about Kerguelen Plateau. It i...The BBC link mention about Kerguelen Plateau. It is micro continent near antartica. It is not lemuria GANESH TARUNhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01009861952968098908noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-2833214092256529302017-02-12T08:46:10.123+05:302017-02-12T08:46:10.123+05:30Lemuria is an imaginary story. This imaginary stor...Lemuria is an imaginary story. This imaginary story was written by western authors in western countries in 19th century. At that time these stories were famous in western countries. In 20th century tamil authors translated and dubbed these stories as kumari kandam. This story is an attempt to increase the tamil antiquity. Tamil literatures did not mentioned about continents sunk or rose or kumari kandam civilization. The words Sangam, Kumari, Kanda are all sanskrit words. The Kumari kandam is 100% fake story. GANESH TARUNhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01009861952968098908noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-89057895726805938492015-04-30T16:55:58.798+05:302015-04-30T16:55:58.798+05:30Mr. Sundar,
I respect your Views research and opin...Mr. Sundar,<br />I respect your Views research and opinion. You keep exploring. Our own people do not support when we march towards a new search or discovery. if the same is done by a foreigner then they accept with heart and say them a great scholar and researcher. Hippocrates always exist, the best way is to ignore and proceed.<br />Ram.Sriram S Dixithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07403674096982330000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-85636536502390459692014-04-28T18:02:22.143+05:302014-04-28T18:02:22.143+05:30Mr. Sundar
Its as simple as this....either you fin...Mr. Sundar<br />Its as simple as this....either you find facts to support ur theory , not some mindless rambling of a guy named IRANIYAR......and secondly, Tamil may have been an ancient dialect. But I'm sure as hell linguistically it was spoken only by a minority...and like most modern languages , didn't evolve......hence , a poor and lost language..... The fact that ur English is better than ur Tamil states my argument.... Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11190470451388513637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-53412764018081098572013-11-01T13:33:59.151+05:302013-11-01T13:33:59.151+05:30Your Link Says Tamil.
Iraniyar Agamporul comes af...Your Link Says Tamil.<br /><br />Iraniyar Agamporul comes after 10th century AD. Neither somebody before him talks about his ideas, not somebody after, Only from last century that there is talk of Kumari kandam. <br /><br />Shows that the idea was Iraniyar agamporul and as you say it is just coincidence some structures have been found and as yourself say, structures have been found all along sea coast of India. Go to Myth of Tamil Sangam article, you will know what I am talking about. <br /><br />Iraniyar talks about Storm Rush or best Tsunami. Now Taking about size of Kumarikandam as described, there is no big volcano in the Southeast Asia which can submerge such large area. Now there is one super volcano near Madagascar, but if it has really submerged kumarikandam, than how come it has no effect on madagascar and Africa ,much nearer than itself. <br /><br />This volcano is responsible for continental drift of Australia, India and Africa. <br /><br />If you want to believe in Graham Hancock theories, I have nothing to talk to you, I demolish conspiracy theories, not creat them. ByeModa Sattvahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16790418181426022089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-46461643404642547622013-11-01T10:47:15.568+05:302013-11-01T10:47:15.568+05:30I talked nothing about "tamil" whether t...I talked nothing about "tamil" whether they were able to speak/write. Nor it was about x million years. You assumed it I said.<br />I only gave you the references that talk about "marine evidence" of structures investigated by NIO-Goa and Graham Hancock. The reference compares with inundation maps that show sea levels in the various past 1000s of years. It talks about the structures found in the ocean of poopmpuhar. Carbon dating, indundation mapping and the matching with 7200 years calculation of Irayanar AgaporuL. Though that could be coincidence - the strcture found in the ocean is real. That still does not prove anything about "Kumari" or "Lemuria" - but it sure warrants further investigation on what else could it be?<br />Same thing about sunken dwaraka evidence - the sonar tracing that shows - structures similar to harappan in the noeth-west of Goa.<br />The real difficulty is the expense in "Marin Archeology" - digging the sea floor is not technologically and financially viable task.<br /><br />I am not obsessed with Kumari or Tamil. But I would not dismiss anything based on a theory that itself has shaky foundation. If Continetal drift throw out sunken continent, continental drift was thrown out by plate tectonic theory (which also does not support sunken continents) - but like continental drift tectonic also is unexplainable on what are their driving/causing forces. Also a lot of experimental geological data contradict with tectonic theory, Therefore the concept of sunken continents still remain alive along with the marine archeological evidences provided by NIO-Goa and Graham Hancock.<br />Sundarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03563514676195338461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-38680403816900523472013-10-30T10:06:35.566+05:302013-10-30T10:06:35.566+05:30You are talking about land masses dated 130 millio...You are talking about land masses dated 130 million years are much older than that, <br />Your assumptions are<br />Humans have evolved and were just like modern humans<br />if they have evolved<br />they were able to speak<br />If they are able to speak<br />They spoke in tamil and not only that they also had script and that script was used to write the literature and that is preserved to this day. <br /><br />That is called Cock and Bull stories. Moda Sattvahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16790418181426022089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-10742602412303399202013-10-30T07:45:14.074+05:302013-10-30T07:45:14.074+05:30A Few more cock and bull stories for you.
- It wa...A Few more cock and bull stories for you.<br /> - It was not "continental drift theory" - that proposed "sunken masses"<br /> - continental drift theory was overridden by "plate tectonic" theory. Tectonics does not support rising of sea or submerging of sea - but that contradicts inundation maps. <br />Also tectonics theory has its own "fantasies" *or unproven assumptions" such as the land was once two (in north and one in south) massive land, india and Australia were part of antartica and so on. Tectonics seem to explain formation of oceans and Himalayas, plateaus. That is why it is hailed by scientists. But it also has own contradictions with voluminous sea floor mapping, seismic data observations - Also it does fully correlate with ages of the rocks of mountains (it significantly underestimates them).<br />All of these of course do not prove the existence of sunken masses - but it questions the theory that dismissed it.<br />Also recently (Jul - 2013) - more megento-sea floor mapping found evidence of sunken lands between india and Australia (which was prohibited by tectonic plate theory)<br />See <br />http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/scientists-find-two-sunken-islands-off-wa-part-of-gondwana-land-link/story-e6frfku0-1226194518960<br />for that "cock and bull" story.<br />I am sure - you will not publish this either.<br />Sundarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03563514676195338461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-72561990237134282342013-10-26T10:49:50.296+05:302013-10-26T10:49:50.296+05:30Cock and Bull StoriesCock and Bull StoriesModa Sattvahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16790418181426022089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-79711016783460722272013-10-25T08:02:58.910+05:302013-10-25T08:02:58.910+05:30Search google for
- Graham Hancock - Underworld ...Search google for <br /> - Graham Hancock - Underworld civilization<br /> ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQZFS9Hij0M )<br /> - Also read his book - Mysterious origin of civilization<br /> - The book also refers to Inundation Maps of Dr, Glenn MilneSundarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03563514676195338461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-36460933749606389282013-05-14T16:14:09.872+05:302013-05-14T16:14:09.872+05:30Is it not imperative that people who put up theori...Is it not imperative that people who put up theories should give evidence. You Seem to be insane to expect others to provide evidence to disprove the theories. Why can't people who put up the theories carbon date the remains under water. They won't, because they can't, since you can't carbon date things found in Imagination.Moda Sattvahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16790418181426022089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-22583091320662860822013-05-13T15:31:27.310+05:302013-05-13T15:31:27.310+05:30For people who call it as made up theory,why don&#...For people who call it as made up theory,why don't they just carbon date the remains under water and justify what they say is correct; You people talk like you created earth and know what happened from the very beginning,while organisations like BBC or NASA exploring these things and approves them scientifically.....Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07084016027977944688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-36229030209171064702012-08-26T13:40:30.024+05:302012-08-26T13:40:30.024+05:30Well Srinivas (or Che nivas)
Why don't you c...Well Srinivas (or Che nivas)<br /> Why don't you cut the crap and present the evidence. Why say there is some unknown things in nature that will come and haunt me. C'mon, the idea was put forth by dravidian scholars to push back the age of tamil literature. That is a made up theory. You expect nature to support your fantasies, Good Luck.Moda Sattvahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16790418181426022089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-67440963417422372832012-08-26T11:54:19.646+05:302012-08-26T11:54:19.646+05:30Mr.Moda Don't forget dat u r arguing 'bout...Mr.Moda Don't forget dat u r arguing 'bout a controversy and i mean it! It has neither been proved r8 nor wrong!It still remains a controversy! It may or may not be proved ri8. So Karan of control u'r emotions! It's a matter of emotions and i know it! But u cant say dat it is ri8 without any proofs! Both of u dont forget dat there still few more attributes of natures dat always says to mankind dat "u r wrong 'bout me!" .,,,.Che N!V@$https://www.blogger.com/profile/07516884627679651415noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-81824790445851844822012-04-03T23:49:06.000+05:302012-04-03T23:49:06.000+05:30Well Karan
I don't need certificate from you...Well Karan <br /> I don't need certificate from you on my goodness.<br /><br />I have to laugh at your logic. If there is a good proof ,why not say it as bullet points. Why say Lot of proof. So, You say lot of proof, when you don't have any, this I have seen consistently on this blog.Moda Sattvahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16790418181426022089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-88524679793604897192012-04-03T19:56:12.743+05:302012-04-03T19:56:12.743+05:30Mr.Moda i agree with you that BBC is nt a authorit...Mr.Moda i agree with you that BBC is nt a authority on historical Matters but what they telecast in BBC was a true fact. If you cant understand the post which posted by Mr.muscat stating they had speak and telecast about kumari kandam (lemuria) with alot of proof means there is alot of proof was found out by archealogist which was revealed in BBC. so when people say there is a proof they mean that it was exist. So pls do not say that it was not exist. If you do not know about it you shouldnt talk like that. If ur good enough you go and refer to tamil history and also world history whereby there is a lot of matters and history and also proof about the existent of civilisation of lemuria(kumari kandam)as well as existence of civilisation of Atlantis . TqAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13030490801422285099noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-54565766624204859582012-02-13T13:20:55.118+05:302012-02-13T13:20:55.118+05:30What BBC is some kind of authority on Historical M...What BBC is some kind of authority on Historical Matters? Lot of Proof means no proof or absolutely no proof.Moda Sattvahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16790418181426022089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-47250524634781604742012-02-13T13:16:51.049+05:302012-02-13T13:16:51.049+05:30Dont Blame Tamil, there is lot of evdienace which ...Dont Blame Tamil, there is lot of evdienace which happend, dont domante Western habits..<br /><br />BBC has cleared with lot of proof to speak about Kumari kandam and tamil langugemuscathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18414731695715735177noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-71644345400915754802008-08-12T12:45:00.000+05:302008-08-12T12:45:00.000+05:30The above BBC link does not support Lemuria contin...The above BBC link does not support Lemuria continent.<BR/><BR/>What is this Proto Dravida , common wake up , there is no such thingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2559723930575740149.post-27751637627981576992008-08-10T23:20:00.000+05:302008-08-10T23:20:00.000+05:30http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/353277.s...http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/353277.stm<BR/><BR/>please see this link..<BR/><BR/>and this<BR/><BR/>http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/004456.htmlTwilight Sensehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07354042871743232710noreply@blogger.com